Animal testing: right or wrong a topic that has always been close to many people hearts is the one of animal testing some believe that it is right completely, some that it is right but only under certain circumstances and others that believe that all animal testing is wrong and will go to extraordinary lengths to stop it. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. The free animal testing research paper (pain and suffering of animals for humans' sake: right or wrong essay) presented on this page should not be viewed as a sample of our on-line writing service if you need fresh and competent research / writing on animal testing, use the professional writing service offered by our company. If it is wrong to inflict pain on a human being, it is just as wrong to inflict pain on an animal moreover, it is argued, the lives of all creatures, great and small, have value and are worthy of respect. In the case of animal rights, say its adherents, there is nothing wrong with seeking solutions that are extreme and far from the ordinary in the united states, the ordinary treatment of animals causes animals to suffer and die on factory farms , in laboratories, on fur farms, in leg-hold traps, in puppy mills, and in zoos and circuses.
Animal testing is portrayed as much worse than it actually is when most people think of animal testing, they think of monkeys and dogs, but in reality, 95% of all animals used are lab-bred mice, fish, and birds. There are people who believe that animal testing should not be done when it comes to lesser items (shampoo, makeup, etc) but that it is ok when it comes to medical reasons then again there are people that believe it is wrong no matter what the case. The scientific case against animal experiments the scientific objections to animal experiments are based on the problem of species differences and the artificiality of the diseases induced in them, meaning that results from animal experiments may be of dubious value to humans. Valid alternatives to animal testing exist, animal-rights supporters point out in fact, the number of animals used in us lab research has decreased by 50 percent in the last 10 years, due to alternative options.
Animal rights vs human rights animal rights vs human rights: righting a wrong a daily reckoning special position paper by jim amrhein, whiskey & gunpowder(sign up free today as you may. Animal testing is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation 50 to 100 million animals are used for such purposes annually these animals are bred on purpose, caught in the wild or supplied by dealers who obtain it from auctions. - animal testing is animal cruelty the way i look at animal testing is a form hateful cruelty none of these people care about if it hurts or kills the animals the cruelty has been going on long enough and i think it is time to stop. Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.
As a forthcoming european union directive promises to transform the way testing on animals is carried out, a researcher and an animal advocate debate whether the practice can ever be justified. Animal testing: right or wrong animal testing is believed to be saving the human race by discovering and making new medicines however, no matter how much it helps humankind, i still believe it to be immoral and inhuman to test painful medicines on helpless animals. Animal tests proved penicillin deadly, strychnine safe and aspirin dangerous in fact, 90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to.
Animal testing, science, medicine, animal welfare, animal rights, ethics animal testing , also known as animal experimentation , animal research and in vivo testing , is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. Ive been thinking a lot about this after i met some animal rights protesters protesting about barclays holding an account for some kind of lab (i dont know a lot of details. 2 thoughts on animal testing: right or wrong sam costa october 29, 2013 at 11:55 pm this is a really good point you make sarah it's tough but i definitely lean towards animal testing.
Background and context animal testing or animal research is the use of non-human animals in scientific experimentation it is estimated that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide — from zebrafish to non-human primates — are used annually. Animal testing: right or wrong o open heart surgeries, coronary bypass surgery and heart transplantation are some of the procedures that came into existence by carrying out experimentation on dogs o insulin for diabetes, lifesaving antibiotics, etc have been made by experimenting on animals. I believe animal testing of cosmetics is wrong but medical testing is necessary human lives are more valuable then animals lives (not saying that animals should be mistreated), but if we can do anything to save human lives and try to advance medicine, it should be done.
Animal testing is wrong for beauty products, but somewhat right if it will help to test medicine that could save people's lives alice, 14, worcestershire, england it's not right to test on animals. Animal testing could be morally wrong, but on the other hand it could be morally right, as it could saves the lives of thousands of humans morally right or morally wrongthere really isn't a. Researchers and organisations which conduct experiments using animals have announced a new code of practice which promises to be open and above board about what they're doing and why. Dangerous animal testing vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide.
Animal testing is wrong 1495 words | 6 pages harmful testing on animals is wrong in american society, many groups and organizations are debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. According to fau protestors, scripps florida-the research institute near fau's jupiter campus-performs experiments on animals during the protest pictured above, one protester said that said that animal testing is cruel. The debate as to whether animal testing is acceptable or not has been debated greatly by agencies within the psychological, scientific and ethical communities. Animal testing is completely and utterly wrong people should not do the horrid things they do to poor, inocent animals in my opinion, anyone who tests anything on animals is a sick human being.